Creation of the Cosmos
In the beginning, there was only Chaos.
This chaos was a formless void. It had no order, the laws of nature weren’t fixed, and any proportion between things was purely accidental. The word chaos (χάος) itself could indicate two things. It could relate to χέειν, to pour, which gives a feeling of watery chaos. Alternatively, it could relate to χαῦνος, meaning spongy or porous, which gives the sense of alternating fullness and void distributed throughout a substance. It is from this formless potential that the Celestial Demiurge, Zeus-Helios, rose from, and whenceforth the ordering act of creation began.
The Demiurge received from Aion, the primordial source of Being, the creative power to craft and set in order the cosmos. The Demiurge established the elements, such as fire, water, and so forth, and out of them, He created the World Soul. He established about the law of nature through the direction of His spoken word, the Logoi, which are His thoughts that are lower manifestations of the higher principles (such as the Forms). It is important to point out that the word cosmos holds a meaning of arrangement, and thus suggests that the universe has a particular orderly arrangement to it.
The universe exists as something that is infinite, and as such there was no creatio ex nihilo (“creation from nothing”), because the universe would not come to be formed if there was nothing that could create it. Rather, the act of creation was creatio ex materia (“creation from [pre-existent] matter”). The creation of the cosmos was the ordering of pre-cosmic disorder, which is done through the Demiurge’s and other Gods’ direction of the logoi. This logoi then infuses into hylē, which is an empty receptive substance that comes from the One who through Aion. Once the hylē is informed by the logoi, it is shaped by it and forms into the matter as we know it. In short, order rose out of chaos thanks to the Demiurge’s ordering of the cosmos.
But what was this entire order that Zeus-Helios set forth based on? The answer is Aion itself, who is the model upon which the Cosmos are based on, and is described as the “Essence of Being” from which all Being stems from. Aion being the cosmic model is important, because it tells us about the nature of the cosmos: that the cosmos are modeled by King Helios based upon something that is eternal, unchangeable, good, and beyond generation. As the blessed Plato quotes in the Timaeus, “Everyone will see that [the Celestial Demiurge] must have looked to the eternal, for the world is the fairest of creations and He is the best of causes.” (Plato, Timaeus 29a)
This act of cosmogenesis isn’t something that happened at some arbitrary prior point in the chronological past, but it is rather a process that is eternal, being always present in illo tempore, and is therefore always accessible through theourgia. (Butler 2010, 142) The Timaeus’ chronology merely portrays multiple ontological levels of being simultaneously present in the material world. The separation from materiality and its principles is, quite simply, impossible. The entire material world came to exist simultaneously as the Demiurge came to exist; meaning there isn’t any temporal or spatial separation between the eternal Forms and their material counterparts. And given the viable translation of logos as “word,” we can put forward the poetic notion that the Demiurge is continuously singing the cosmos and our world into its form.
Creation of Mankind
When the common father and King of all things, Zeus-Helios, was setting all things in order, there fell from Him drops of sacred blood, and from these drops of divine blood arose the race of man. (Iulianus 2006, II 307) It, therefore, follows that we are all kinsmen, as the Gods tell us through Plato, and as we ought to believe, that we are all descended from the Gods; all being members of the same family, which is ultimately that of Zeus. (Iulianus 2006, II 307) Therefore, His greatest concern is the love of mankind and the protection of His family.
It is detailed in the sacred Chaldean Oracles that Love (Eros) is the first creation of the divine Zeus. (Chaldean Oracles, fr. 42) He then fills each soul with a “deep eros” to bring them back to the Gods. (Chaldean Oracles, fr. 43) This indicates that what part of the soul the Demiurge creates is, truly, filled with Love.
We bear witness that at creation there was more than two people, for if there were merely two people our laws wouldn’t show such great divergence among peoples, the tongues of people wouldn’t be so vastly different, the forms of people wouldn’t take on such a wide array of beauty, nor would it be likely that the whole earth was filled with people by one man and woman; even if the woman bore many children at a time to their husband. (Iulianus 2006, II 305-307)
Rather, it is to be understood that many people of a great diversity came into the world at once, which gave rise to the vast differences among the peoples of our world. The Gods collectively gave birth to mankind, with the Gods who rule over birth first receiving mankind’s eternal souls from Zeus-Helios, and then collectively giving forth many men, determining their shape and culture appropriate to the climate and country they originated from. Each people have national Gods, who are subservient to Zeus-Helios as viceroys are to a King. These national Gods watch over their people, with their own order of Angels, Daimons, Heroes, and a particular order of spirits which obey and work for the higher powers. All other creator Gods are not competitors of Zeus-Helios, but rather they are His children and helpers. (Iulianus 2006, I 345) (Iulianus 2006, I 359)
We, therefore, garner that though the world has an array of diversity, our diversity is all ultimately many great paths that lead to one divine truth, for uniformity precedes multiplicity. For this, we are all ultimately kinsmen, as all of humanity is derived from the blood of Zeus-Helios. The great diversity of the world is not an accident, but rather it was divinely fashioned on purpose.
Clark, Dennis. “Iamblichus Egyptian Neoplatonic Theology in De Mysteriis.” The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2, no. 2 (2008): 164-205. doi:10.1163/187254708×282358.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus Augustus, and Wilmer Cave. Wright. The works of emperor Julian I. London: Heinemann etc., 1962.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus Augustus, and Wilmer Cave. Wright. The works of emperor Julian II. London: Heinemann etc., 1962.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus Augustus, and Wilmer Cave. Wright. The works of emperor Julian III. London: Heinemann etc., 1962.
Kupperman, Jeffrey S. Living Theurgy: A Course in Iamblichus’ Philosophy, Theology and Theurgy. London: Avalonia, 2014.
Majercik, Ruth. The Chaldean Oracles: Text, Translation and Commentary. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1989.
McDonough, Richard. “Plato: Organicism.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed August 28, 2017. http://www.iep.utm.edu/platoorg/.
Plato, and Benjamin Jowett. The complete works of Plato. United States?: Akasha Pub., 2008.
Shaw, Gregory. Theurgy and the soul: the Neoplatonism of Iamblichus. Second ed. Kettering, OH: Angelico Press, 2014.